|
From: Stephan M. <Ste...@ia...> - 2007-09-06 06:49:52
|
To fulfill the requirements of the license (LGPL/GPL) you ... - DO NOT have to distribute the source code of your own application. The LGPL explicitly allows you to link your (closed source) application against the library - if you distribute libusb-win32's driver or DLL along with your own application then you either have to provide libusb-win32's source code or point your users to a location where they can download it. You also have to include libusb-win32's licence and copyright so that your users know about their rights (and responsibilities) Stephan > Hello everybody on the list, > > This is my first post on this list, and I hope that someone here > could bring me precisions, even if my question may sounds dumb. > > I am developping an application for my employer (that is, a > commercial application, although this application will maybe be > distributed freely). > This application uses LibUsb-win32 in order to establish an usb > communication with an usb device and exchange data via bulk transfers. > The application is (currently) compiled with VisualStudio, includes > the usb.h header and libusb.lib (in order to compile). The LibUsb- > win32 library in itself has not been changed in any way. > > My question is about license and distribution : I have carrefully > read the LGPL v2.1, but I would like to make sure that I fully > understand all the terms, in order not to deny the authors rights inany way. > > Since my application "contains no derivative of any portion of the > library, but is designed to work with the library by being compiled > or linked with it", it is a "work that uses the library", and I > think that I am free to distribute my application without providing > the source code and/or the object files of my application. Am I right? > In a case where my application would display copyright notice, I > plan to mention LibUsb-Win32. > I also plan to distribute the LibUsb-Win32 library, including > copyright notice, disclamer of warranty and a copy of the LGPL, as expected. > > Could someone confirms that I not going the wrong way? > If I am not in a case that allows me to distribute my application > without providing the source and objets files of my application, > what should I do to be allowed to do so? > > Thank you in advance for your support > And sorry for this rather boring question (My aim is to make sure > that I satisfy my obligations under the license, and to go against > the rights of the authors) > > V. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Libusb-win32-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-win32-devel |