Re: [Libsigcx-main] status of porting sigcx to sigc++2.0
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
rottmann
From: Tim M. <tma...@re...> - 2006-01-06 00:39:22
|
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 22:44 +0100, klaus triendl wrote: > hi, > > there was a big discussion in june 2004 about porting sigcx to sigc > ++2.0. Parnell Flynn offered hist help and Christer Palm started a > lengthy discussion on this topic. > > Did anything happen in the meantime? > Hello Klaus I'm not sure if anything has happened in the meantime but I'll take this opportunity to let you and the rest of the list subscribers know that I wrote a cross thread signaling library a few months ago that is similar in concept to sigcx. I called it glibmmx because it depends on glibmm 2.4(for the thread stuff) and not just sigc++2.0. It has a number of dispatchers like sigcx, including one that works with glibmm/gtkmm. It builds the templates using m4 during the build so it won't look complete if you just browse cvs. Although it *should* work, I haven't done enough testing or written enough examples and documentation for me to feel it is ready for a release(busy with other projects at the moment). If someone wants to port sigcx to sigc++2.0 you may want to at least have a look at my library as I think the API is better that sigcx in some ways. If anyone is interested or needs help building/using it please let me know. There is also a class for performing lock free programming using Read Copy Update(RCU), please ignore that as it is proof of concept only. You can find the library here http://sourceforge.net/projects/glibmmx Tim. |