[Libsigcx-main] Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] libsigcx and gtkmm 2.4

[Daniel E. <dan...@gm...>]

Am So, den 13.06.2004 um 21:34 Uhr +0200 schrieb Christer Palm:

> Hmm. Perhaps it would be better if you took a look at the code and told 
> me where the problem is?

Sorry, just didn't have the time to do that.  I consider this to be a
conceptional problem though, not specific to your code.  Do tell me if
I'm missing something.

> I'm not taking it lightly. My point was that although you could 
> technically accomplish the same thing without arguments, arguments is a 
> pretty useful feature.

Agreed.

> If you have similar code in perhaps hundreds of places doing similar 
> things, then it would make sense to attempt to make a generic 
> implementation of that pattern. Which is exactly what this is about.

Indeed.  The question is if we can write a generic implementation that
actually works.

--Daniel