Re: [Libsigcx-main] Re: [gtkmm] libsigcx and gtkmm 2.4

[Andreas R. <a.r...@gm...>]

Martin Schulze <mar...@hi...> writes:

> Am 2004.05.30 14:21 schrieb(en) Christer Palm:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> I'm (finally) moving over to gtkmm 2.4, but I can't find a libSigCX
>> package to match sigc++-2.0 used in 2.4. It appears that it only
>> supports sigc++-1.2.
>
> That's right. I think libSigCX is being maintained by Andreas Rottmann.
> I didn't hear of any plans to port it to sigc++-2.0
>
Right, I've mostly stalled development of libsigcx, but with a helping
hand, I might invest a bit of effort to make it work on sigc++ 2.0. (I
mainly waited to see if there would be any demand at all :).

>> I tried to simply tweak configure.ac to make it build against the
>> sigc++-2.0 package, but it doesn't compile, unfortunately.
>
> libSigCX depends on internal structures of sigc++-1.2. Since sigc++-2.0
> has been written from scratch the internal structure is completely
> different.
>
>> Does anyone have any updates on the status of libSigCX or otherwise
>> have any experience that could help me out?
>
> Which classes from libSigCX do you need? At some time I had some
> random thoughts about libSigCX & sigc++-2.0 - Some things should be
> much easier to implement with the new API.
>
I've thought about moving the sigcx functionality into Yehia[0] when
switching to sigc++ 2.0.

[0] http://ucxx.sf.net

Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | Rotty@ICQ      | 118634484@ICQ | a.r...@gm...
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

To iterate is human; to recurse, divine.