Andrew Smith made a great APNG Google Summer of Code contribution and continued to catch up his patch with the latest libpng releases.
As greater APNG support by Firefox 3 and Opera 9.5 is emerging it would be great to give all tools using libpng the possibility to support APNG as well by testing and integrating his patch.
Best regards
René
Logged In: YES
user_id=7859
Originator: NO
no
Logged In: YES
user_id=153827
Originator: YES
Thanks for the info... everything is fine as long as APNG support is already in the official Firefox release.
Maybe MNG will reach that goal in less then another 5 years...
Logged In: YES
user_id=7859
Originator: NO
For what it's worth, I'm the one who is keeping the mozilla APNG patch in sync with libpng
releases. For the latest developments in MNG, see the anipng and PLAY/RECO proposals at
ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/png-group/documents
Glenn
Hi, I'd just like to comment really quick on the APNG support. It seems to me that it is a reimplementation of functionality already solved by the MNG format. Why didn't the mozilla team actually just use/update libmng instead of patching libpng and pushing this new "APNG Standard", drafted by a few other developers?
That said, I tried building Thunderbird 3 against my system's libpng and found that the APNG support is a requirement. So I went out and found the newest patch (1.2.29) that I could find, and updated it to match my version (1.2.33) of libpng.
I've got this patch uploaded at the following place:
* http://people.freebsd.org/~cokane/patches/libpng-apng.patch
It would probably become helpful to many people's sanity if this were to just make it into libpng, rather than attempt to manage a separate patch forever. This is especially true if the mozilla-backed APNG becomes a "fork" of the original lib.
Is there any news here?
*Many* web developers would appreciate in this support as Chrome/Safari would probably support APNG in case of merge.
Actually, APNG is not as much useful as we can think, but some usages are, like a little loader image, or a rapid logo animation. APNG just fits these needs with simplicity.
Is there any /good/ reasons to reject it now?
View and moderate all "feature-requests Discussion" comments posted by this user
Mark all as spam, and block user from posting to "Feature Requests"
Webkit developers need the support of apng in libpng.
Web developers need support of apng in major browsers to yse it instead of shitty gif.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1799624&group_id=5624&atid=355624