Re: [Libphidget-devel] More on indent

[Jack S. <js...@ja...>]

On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 21:38, Vadim Tkachenko wrote:
> According to Jack Strohm:
> 
> > > > [jstrohm@oishi libphidget]$ make indent
> > > > indent: unknown option "-blank-lines-after-block-comments"
> > 
> > I cut and paste the error, not sure where the single - came from.
> 
> That's funny...
> 
> > > > and then woops! all the source code files were empty   :-(
> > > > 
> > > > no problem, but need to add a something so that if indent dies it
> > > > doesn't kill the original file.
> > > 
> > > Will fix that.
> 
> Fixed.
>  
> > please, be bad to loose all changes before you check in cause you called
> > "make indent"
> 
> ??? You mean do *not* check in the *.c/cc/h files? Of course not, only
> Makefile.am change was committed...
> 
> Did I understand you properly?

I was just commenting, that if it would be bad if any developer deleted
his copy of the files (see problem you fixed above) right before he
checked it in.


> 
> > > > started over again, and set up the configuration like you said above,
> > > > now if this is the style it's checked in as, and we can run indent-local
> > > > to get our own preferences it's fine with me, but I personally don't
> > > > care for it.
> > > 
> > > So, would it be OK if I just commit it as it is with the above options and
> > > merge it back to main branch?
> > 
> > Yeah, as long as we are sure it won't flip/flop on us like the last
> > style :-)
> 
> :( Yes, that's exactly what I was hunting for. The set of options in
> indent.rules that I've just committed produces the stable code - multiple
> 'make indent && make' runs recompile the code just once.

Looks good.

make indent && make only compiles the first time.

cool!