Re: [Libphidget-devel] just playing with indent . . .

[Jack S. <js...@ja...>]

On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 20:50, Vadim Tkachenko wrote:
> According to Jack Strohm:
> 
> > hmmm, doesn't sound good.
> 
> OK, preliminary research shows that I've made a major flop here :( Shouldn't
> have touched the indent at all. So far, I haven't found the tools that work
> reliably (astyle has its own problems, and there's nothing else, really...)
> 
> Two ways out:
> 
> 1. Roll back all the cc/c/h commits to the way it was before
> 
> 2. Curse a lot, and keep the code the way it is now, and remove (rather
>    comment out, though) the indent related portions of the makefile, hoping
>    silently that there'll be a day when they fix their bugs.
> 
> Even though I hate the GNU style, I'd rather go with #2, 'cause this is at
> least a sort of a standard... Minor mistakes that indent introduced can be
> fixed manually, should there be a need to do so.
> 
> #2 gets my vote. What's yours? Remember, you're the boss here.

I'd say #2, although, the current way the code is indented needs a bit
of work.  What is GNU style exactly anyway.