Re: [Libphidget-devel] just playing with indent . . .

[Vadim T. <vt...@fr...>]

According to Jack Strohm:
> On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 19:19, Vadim Tkachenko wrote:
> > According to Jack Strohm:
> > 
> > > which version of indent are you using?
> >  
> > > [jstrohm@oishi libphidget]$ indent --version
> > > GNU indent 2.2.8
> > 
> > 2.2.5 here.
> > 
> > This is nuts... Do this: just remove all .c, .h and .cc files and do 'cvs
> > update' again (hope you didn't change anything), and just hack away on that.
> > Meanwhile, I'll investigate the alternatives to indent, and/or find a
> > combination of options that produces an idempotent processing.
> 
> that's what I've been doing, "cvs release", and then a full checkout.
> 
> Maybe since we are running different versions, the default settings are
> different.  Maybe we should explicitly set all options for the default.

Nope,

Here's the root cause:

http://home.hccnet.nl/d.ingamells/indent_15.html#SEC15

It's just not smart enough. Funny, I've been using it with Java files quite
consistently... Probably because my rules were simpler.

Give me some time, I'll sort it out.

--vt