Re: [Libofx-devel] Simplicity

[Mike <mgo...@ya...>]

Thanks.  That's new info to me.  You saved me a lot of time.

> No, I don't.
>
> OFX is banking-transaction centric. While overly complex (otherwise
> libofx wouldn't need to exist), it probably wouldn't be that bad for
> exchanging transaction data if it were implemented properly (sadly it is
> not well implemented by banks either). What it is not at all meant to
> represent is collections of general accounting data.
>
> QIF, for all it's numerous faults, is actually not as bad as OFX for
> accounting data storage.
>
> --
>
> Benoit Grégoire, ing., PMP, PSM