From: Benoit G. <be...@co...> - 2011-06-08 02:44:44
|
On June 4, 2011 11:06:55 PM Bryan Donlan wrote: > Hi, > > As mentioned some time before, I've wrote a patch for libofx[1] to > hide internal symbols. By hiding internal symbols, we can avoid > external programs inadverently using internal (subject to change) > symbols by making it very explicit what is considered internal or not. > This has already turned up one case of poorly documented ABI symbols > (ofx_*_msg), which I've also added to the header. Additional > information can be found at the comment block at the top of the patch. Applied > Because this does change the ABI slightly by deleting symbols (alebit > only ones not listed in the public header), it may be safest to bump > the soname if this patch is applied. Note I don't intend to apply this > patch to the debian packaging without upstream blessings, as it > changes the ABI in this manner. Ok, playing it safe. > Also, you had mentioned you'd like to roll my changes into a 0.9.5 to > keep everything in sync - are you likely to release soon? I have some > fixes for the debian package itself that I'd like to upload soon, but > if 0.9.5 is coming out soon I'll wait for it. Well, I think we'll be pretty much ready for a 0.9.5 when you are. -- Benoit Grégoire, ing., PMP, PSM |