From: Rémi Denis-C. <re...@re...> - 2011-05-18 05:26:34
|
On Tue, 17 May 2011 21:03:44 +0200, Diego Biurrun <di...@bi...> wrote: >> If they really are missing on a real-life system you can replace them >> with autofoo AFAICT. > > Just replacing them with their equivalents without "fast" in the name > seems way easier. It is easier for you. But there must be a reason why the author used those types. I guess they really are int_fast32_t is typically a 64-bits integer on Alpha; that's for compilation. For development, I think telling that we only care about the low order 32-bits is also valuable. So neither int32_t nor int64_t fit here IMHO. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ |