From: David I. L. <dl...@vt...> - 2011-05-17 20:21:12
|
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Diego Biurrun <di...@bi...> wrote: > The int_fast types are less portable because they are a part of the > standard that is actually implemented on fewer systems. > Which systems lack int_fast* support? -dave |