From: Diego B. <di...@bi...> - 2008-10-09 16:07:23
|
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:16:50PM +0200, Lionel Debroux wrote: > Diego Biurrun wrote: > > > > A nitpick about your patch that updates the FSF address: I > > > noticed that trunk/src/getopt.{c,h} remain untouched. > > > > Yes, that was done on purpose, > Ah, OK. > > these files are from glibc, not libmpeg2. > Indeed, but is there something that prevents the libmpeg2 project from > updating the FSF address in files originating from glibc and contained > in libmpeg2, on the occasion of the same correction of factual > information that has become wrong, in other files of the libmpeg2 project ? Only the fact that the diff to the upstream versions of the files gets bigger. > >> What do people think ? > > > > Your patch is wrong. > > [snip] > > Before your change this file was licensed LGPL, now it is a weird > > mix of GPL and LGPL. Also, before it said the file pertained to > > the GNU C library, now it claims to belong to the GNU C library > > in two places and to mpeg2dec in another place. > Doh. Screw copy&paste without re-reading. Thanks for pointing out my > mistake. > > > What do you, and others, think about upgrading the getopt files ? If by upgrading you mean fixing the license header like I just did for libmpeg2 then my answer is: I would leave the files untouched since they are externally imported files. You could of course send the GNU C library people a patch to fix this. It's incredibly lame that not even the core GNU projects get this right. Diego |