Re: [Libmls0-developers] RE: libmls-0.3 released

[Daniel S. <ds...@ho...>]

> One final thing. If we have upgraded the project name to level 1 then I think we need to upgrade the major revision number to 1 as well. Perhaps 1.0.
> 

I think using 1.0 as version number indicates that the library is API 
and ABI stable. I would like to review the API quite a bit before I 
would like to call it stable. Also, since I have not yet used libmls to 
measure anything I don't know if the problems I had last year (the MLS 
measurement results seemed to be low pass filtered) is still there...

Also, I think we need a sample app and at least basic API docs before we 
can call this stable. MSVC project files and DLL:s for Windows is 
another thing I would like to see before a 1.0 release.

Just my two cents...

Regards
Daniel Sundberg