[Libmls0-developers] RE: libmls-0.3 released

[Scott T. <Sco...@in...>]

Hi Daniel

There is now a lot more to libmls than I expected. Great work everybody. =


A little while ago Daniel talked about replacing the FHT with another =
scheme to generate the impulse response, which appears to have been =
done. Can you confirm that it is as fast as the FHT? Does the =
correlation still create a perfect unit response as it should with the =
MLS? I would like to introduce the FHT back in as a secondary option =
only (because in DSP/microcontroller applications where there might be =
no single cycle multiply the FHT is way, way, way faster). I will write =
it myself from the original papers so we don't have to share the =
copyright around any more than we have to.=20

I must get started on a test/demo app.

One final thing. If we have upgraded the project name to level 1 then I =
think we need to upgrade the major revision number to 1 as well. Perhaps =
1.0.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Sundberg [mailto:ds...@ho...]
Sent: Monday, 21 June 2004 3:10 AM
To: lib...@li...
Cc: Scott Thomson; dan...@br...
Subject: libmls-0.3 released


Hi there!

I have now uploaded libmls-0.3 on sourceforge. Please have a look at=20
this and if it looks ok I will announce it on freshmeat tomorrow. Then=20
we might get some response so that we can start to think about next step =

in this project.

Also, I have created a simple web page: http://libmls0.sf.net

Daniel and Scott: I CC you this mail since I think we have had some=20
problems with the mailinglist. Let us see how it works this time...

Enjoy!

Daniel Sundberg

---
ds...@ho...
http://sumpan.com