From: Vikram G. <vik...@gm...> - 2019-04-14 21:54:13
|
Hi Yuxiang, It should be possible to move the construction of the finite element and the specification of the quadrature rule inside the loop over elements. Did this give any errors, or is otherwise unfeasible for performance reasons ? Thanks. Vikram Garg vikramvgarg.github.io/ On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 4:30 PM Yuxiang Wang <yw...@vi...> wrote: > Dear all, > > Sorry for the spam. > > I have a mix of QUAD4 and TRI3 elements in my mesh, and would like to use > different quadrature rule orders for each type. Specifically, I'd like to > have order THIRD for QUAD4 and SECOND for TRI3. By default, the orders are > both THIRD. > > In most examples, I noticed that the specification of qrule is only for the > entire FEType and not dependent on the element type (e.g. QUAD4 vs TRI3). > Could you please share with me some hints on how to make element-dependent > qrule order selection happen? > > Best, > Shawn > > > -- > Yuxiang "Shawn" Wang, PhD > yw...@vi... > +1 (434) 284-0836 > > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-users mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users > |