From: Roy S. <roy...@ic...> - 2018-08-30 16:09:03
|
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Derek Gaston wrote: > Maybe. Certainly the "configure" that we have is really good... and > that won't change. It _may_ be possible to make them coexist for a > bit. I'd be much more open to experimentation if we can get things to coexist; I've done that in the past with CMake-vs-autotools (aka we-have-some-Windows-users vs this-works-better-for-everyone-else) on another project and it was okay. I don't know if it would be as smooth with autotools-vs-autotools_minus_automake or if we'd have name clash headaches, though. > Hah - I do agree with having to build build-systems. There doesn't yet seem to be a build system that doesn't suck, so it's not *entirely* ridiculous to envision reinventing the wheel here. Would it be better to try and figure out how to ameliorate the suck in automake, though? I don't mean to start a flame war but "the rebuild scripts are too confusing" is a fair criticism and if the list of other criticisms isn't too long or too foundational then we might be able to reduce the damage. --- Roy |