Re: [Libmesh-users] Syncronize a vector among processes

[Renato P. <re...@gm...>]

>> It sounds like you'd rather be doing a tuple<int, int, int, int>?
Well, that would be my second shot, which I consider dusty but healthy.
*Ideally* I would do a MyClass { int p1; int p2; int p3; int p4; }.

>> I'll try setting up a unit test with that and see if I can fix ...
There's no need to hurry. I moved forward with the nested pairs.
I wrapped it with access functions (p.second.second.second is the deepest
raw int).

Thanks,
Renato

On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 2:02 AM, Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...>
wrote:

>
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Renato Poli wrote:
>
> Thanks. Will try that.
>> It is constant size.
>> In fact, I could make my way through in a dirty pair<int, pair<int,
>> pair<int, int> > >
>> I'm debugging something else right now.
>> I will have to come back later an ddo the specialization.
>>
>
> It sounds like you'd rather be doing a tuple<int, int, int, int>?
> I'll try setting up a unit test with that and see if I can fix the
> tuple specialization, but if you're in a hurry don't wait on me.
> ---
> Roy
>