From: Derek G. <fri...@gm...> - 2018-06-20 20:21:33
|
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:56 PM Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...> wrote: > Hmm... would it be sane to write a shim iterator class, just something > to prevent conversion to std::data_type_now_locked_in_stone::iterator, > and then return a pair of those? > Can we just assume that everyone will capture the return value using "auto" so it's not a problem? :-) >From some snooping around it looks like MultiMap returns BidirectionalIterators... could we just make a std::pair of those and return them? Derek |