From: Roy S. <roy...@ic...> - 2018-01-29 21:12:16
|
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, Manav Bhatia wrote: > I ended up creating a function similar to the one in LInearImplicitSystem to get around this issue. > > Working out fine now. Good to hear. Is your get_linear_solver() anything general enough to move upstream to NonlinearImplicitSystem? The lack of a get_linear_solver() overload there might be because I was going to add one and realized some good reason why I couldn't, but a more likely scenario is just that I wasn't using (or testing with, therefore) that class and didn't want to implement something blind. --- Roy |