[Libmesh-users] 答复: Not decreasing error bound

[<cau...@gm...>]

Sorry for habitually clicking “reply” instead of “reply all” and I resend it now. 

 

Hi David,

 

I solve the system with the command below:

 

-ksp_type preonly -pc_type lu -pc_factor_mat_solver_package mumps

 

It means that the system is solved by KSP with LU as preconditioning. Should I precise the asymmetric solver in my command? How to write it correctly? Thanks for your help. 

 

Regards,

Gauvain

 

 

发件人: David Knezevic [mailto:dav...@ak...] 
发送时间: 2018年1月29日 10:05
收件人: Gauvain Wu <cau...@gm...>
抄送: libmesh-users <lib...@li...>
主题: Re: [Libmesh-users] Not decreasing error bound

 

Hello,

 

The convergence behavior that you describe is typical of reduced basis convergence: It will plateau after an error reduction of about six orders of magnitude or so. So it sounds like the convergence is working fine in the sense that you got a reduction from 1.3569e7 to 41. When you get the message "Exiting greedy because the same parameters were selected twice" that is another indication that the greedy algorithm has plateaued.

 

I do not know why the RB solution and FE solution did not match well at the end, though --- that of course indicates that something is wrong. One thought; Did you make sure to use an asymmetric solver, since thermoelasticity is not symmetric?

 

David

 

 

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:13 AM, <cau...@gm... <mailto:cau...@gm...> > wrote:

Hi all,



I made a thermoelasticity model based on the cantilever example,
reduced_basis_ex5, by adding a new temperature variable. At the beginning of
the basis training procedure, the maximum error bound drops sharply from
1.35694e+07 to 41 as the dimension of the basis increases from 0 to 5. After
that, although the basis dimension keeps growing, the error bound stops
decreasing and stays at a certain number. The relative training tolerance is
set at 1.e-7 and the mesh is a T-shaped pipe.



---- Basis dimension: 5 ----

Performing RB solves on training set

Maximum error bound is 2.42578



Performing truth solve at parameter:

h: 1.055972e+01

h_Tinf: 2.472563e+02

heat_flux: 4.261782e+01



---- Basis dimension: 6 ----

Performing RB solves on training set

Maximum error bound is 2.43818



Performing truth solve at parameter:

h: 1.151397e+01

h_Tinf: 2.473108e+02

heat_flux: 4.481571e+01



---- Basis dimension: 7 ----

Performing RB solves on training set

Maximum error bound is 2.44673



Exiting greedy because the same parameters were selected twice



The RB result obtained from this basis differs a lot from the FEM result. I
searched archives of the mailing list and found that this phenomenon might
result from an overly low training tolerance. However, the initial error
bound being nearly e+07, if I select a less strict tolerance, I will end up
having an unsatisfying error and probably a worse result. Could you please
suggest me some advice? I would be grateful for your response.



Best regards,

Gauvain

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
Lib...@li... <mailto:Lib...@li...> 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users