From: John P. <jwp...@gm...> - 2017-12-04 19:01:25
|
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Alam, Jahrul <al...@mu...> wrote: > Hi John, > > Thanks for the clarification. Can you suggest a work around? If I do, > mesh0.read(lshaped_0.vtu) and mesh1.read(lshaped_1.vtu), and so on, is it > possible to end up with a DistributedMesh by combining mesh0, > mesh1,............. at the user level? > > Or, is there another format that supports parallel read and write? > I wouldn't worry about parallel read/write until you get to a point that you are working with a Mesh that's too big to even be opened on one processor. Your code can still run in parallel even when you read a mesh in serial. -- John |