From: Roy S. <roy...@ic...> - 2013-04-03 16:57:30
|
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > which leaves only the possibility that RemoteElemSetup is somehow > not properly calling he Singleton::Setup base class constructor? > > Can you apply this on the affected systems and make sure that's not > the case? I already ran through this in the debugger. Singleton::Setup::Setup is indeed being called from the RemoteElemSetup. --- Roy |