From: Manav B. <bha...@gm...> - 2013-03-14 20:28:02
|
Thanks Roy. This might rule out the boundary condition issue. I will keep digging. Manav On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...>wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Manav Bhatia wrote: > > I have a question about AMR. Once an element is refined, if it lies on >> the boundary, then do the children elmeents inherit the appropriate >> boundary_info tags? I am looking through elem_refinement.C in method >> refine() and am not sure if this is being done there. >> > > It's not done there; the trickery is currently in the BoundaryInfo > methods. Dig into boundary_info.C and you'll see that we don't even > store boundary tags on child elements - when we're requested to return > a child's boundary ids on side s, we see if that side is on a side of > its top-level ancestor, and we return the boundary ids for that > ancestor's side. > --- > Roy > |