Re: [Libmesh-devel] Sparsity patterns and post-facto matrices

[Roy S. <roy...@ic...>]

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:

> For now I'll vote for #2.  One thing that you could add to #2 is a method
> that we could call to clear/delete the sparsity pattern in the case where we
> _know_ we won't need it again and we really do need the memory...

Nice idea - if we go with #2 then I'll be sure to do so.
---
Roy