From: John P. <pet...@cf...> - 2012-08-21 15:53:17
|
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:11 PM, John Peterson <pet...@cf...> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:46 PM, John Peterson > <pet...@cf...> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...> wrote: >>> >>> This is against the SVN head. It seems to work fine on the >>> all-too-few tests I've run, but does it pass the INL test suite too? >> >> I'll give it a try now. > > Actually, this looks a lot better! I think it's working (see attached > screenshots). > > Gotta run now, I'll run it through the MOOSE test suite tomorrow... So there are small differences in several of the tests which I am investigating (surprisingly, the wedge test is now passing!) but I think there may still be a problem with subdomain-restricted variables and periodic BCs. I think Cody has discussed this with you previously but those messages did not make it to the list, so in summary for this test: .) block 1 is the four elements on the left .) block 2 is the four elements on the right .) variable u (not shown) is restricted to block 1 .) diffusion is solved on both blocks .) v is periodic from top to bottom along the entire mesh .) u is periodic from top to bottom on block 1 only .) Dirichlet boundaries on left and right As you can see in 'patch.png', the values of v in the nodes between the two subdomains are being set to zero as of your latest patch. The u values are not affected by the patch. -- John |