RE: [Libmesh-devel] MeshTools questions

[KIRK, B. (JSC-E. (NASA) <ben...@na...>]

Bug, yes.  I accept the blame on that one... ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: lib...@li...
[mailto:lib...@li...] On Behalf Of John
Peterson
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:14 PM
To: Roy Stogner
Cc: lib...@li...
Subject: [Libmesh-devel] MeshTools questions


Roy Stogner writes:
 > 
 > Why is all_second_order() disabled in parallel?  It looks like this  >
function will break once we parallize the mesh, but as long as we've  > got
a copy of the mesh on every processor then it should be fine to  > perform
any deterministic operations on it on every processor.

I think the original author was Daniel Dreyer or Steffen?  Maybe they just
had no way of testing in parallel.

 > Boundary conditions are preserved by all_second_order() but not by  >
all_tri().  Bug?

Sounds like one.  Good find.

-J



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September
19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile &
Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security
* Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Lib...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel