On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:01 PM, John Peterson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
should be initialized in the constructor in the order they areYour second patch isn't really a great fix, since technically things
declared in the class,
but, thinking about it for a moment, this
constructor is just oddly-written in general: there's not really any
need to call all these vector default constructors explicitly.
Probably just really old code I'm guessing...should be fine to just
delete all of those guys.
Anyway, all our tests seem to pass here.