On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <email@example.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 9:03 AM, John Peterson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
wrote:So that is done now in the branch...
> Damn... Yeah this would clearly help the most for the parallel runs. No reason to really optimize anything else until that's implemented!
Nice work! We are now well below 7 Gb now:but the best part is it should scale much better while adding processors (doing some more runs to test that theory at the moment.)