We have plenty of adaptivity tests that we normally run with parmesh... but we're still getting up and running with the new build system... so we can't effectively test stuff right now.  Hopefully soon.

Thanks for working on this though!  We don't always need Parmesh, but it's nice to know it's there in case we do!


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Roy Stogner <roystgnr@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:

I'm turning ParallelMesh distributed repartitioning back on!  I fixed
a few bugs in the way we were doing distributed mesh element/node
redistribution, and I no longer see logic errors from the libMesh
examples with --enable-parmesh; I fixed a tricky bug in the way we
were doing distributed mesh constraint communication, and I no longer
see any correctness errors in the libMesh examples with

Now, I'm not naive enough to think that the libMesh examples are a
great test suite, so we need much more testing.  Would those of you
with more rigorous distributed-mesh-compatible-application regression
test suites run the svn head through them (configured with
--enable-parmesh, and executed with as many different processor counts
as you have time for) and see if there's any more subtle breakage?