Give me a bit - I'll test it in about an hour or so.


On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Roy Stogner <> wrote:

On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:

> I applied this on libmesh.automake, which imposes strict namespacing, and I had to add
> 'using namepace libMesh;'
> inside your anonymous namespace in parallel_implementation.h so that Parallel:: was found properly.

Bah - I forgot to test with namespace separation enabled.  Thanks for
catching that!

> Then testing with FIN-S showed no issues!

Thanks, to both you and Paul!  Unless I hear screams from elsewhere
I'll commit this afternoon.

Any preferences or suggestions on the naming issue?  I really don't
want to replace (much less deprecate) the old Parallel::sum(x) type
calls until we've got something nicer looking than
Parallel::Communicator_World.sum(x) to replace them.

CommWorld.sum(x)?  Comm_World.sum(x)?  Comm.sum(x)?  MPIWorld.sum(x)?

Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
Libmesh-devel mailing list