From: Farkas L. <lf...@lf...> - 2009-06-27 14:19:39
|
Frank Warmerdam wrote: > Farkas Levente wrote: > > hi, >> it's nice to see that someone still working on libjpeg. i'd be very >> happy if the next release solve somehow some of our biggest problem >> see in: >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=4A12C61E.9010701%40lfarkas.org >> >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=20090424140822.GA21954%40amd.home.annexia.org >> >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-May/001380.html >> >> in short the problem is when we try to compile libjpeg on win32 there >> are conflicts in windows system header files and libjpeg's header. >> is there any change that this will be also fixed? >> thanks. > > Farkas, > > As Tom mentioned in the thread, the intention is that libjpeg 6x is > intended to remain ABI compatible which makes me nervous about > changes to boolean or INT32 definitions. > > I have run into frequent issues with the boolean definition myself in > builds with libtiff and often have to futz with it. I'd like to improve > things but I don't want to alter the ABI. > > It might be a good idea to file a very clear summary ticket on the issue > in the libjpeg bug tracker. i do. > Hopefully this area of confusion will be dealt with in libjpeg 7x. just to be clear current code is not usable on win32, so any solution would be better then the current situation. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" |