From: stephan b. <st...@ei...> - 2003-11-11 10:42:24
|
On Saturday 08 November 2003 09:52, Rusty Ballinger wrote: > > i've got about a trillion things to commit to CVS, but there's a bit > > caveat which needs to be made public before i do: this code is only known > > to work on pretty recent compilers (only tested on gcc 3.3x, and WON'T > > work on gcc 2.9x). If that's a big deal let me know and i won't commit > > it. > > "How much" does it not work on 2.9x? I've been fiddling with i'm not actually sure. i know of at least two problems: - gcc 2.95.x does not allow the word 'typename' in some cases where 3.x explicitely requires it. (Easy to fix with macros.) - gcc 2.x doesn't have the necessary template class specialization support. This features is relied upon /heavily/, and there is no substitute for it. -- ----- st...@ei... - http://www.einsurance.de Student: "Master, you must teach me the way of liberation!" Master: "Tell me who it is that binds you." Student: "No one binds me!" Master: "Then why do you seek liberation?" |