[fU] proposed (minor) tree re-org

[stephan b. <st...@wa...>]

How does this sound:

Split lib/ up like so:

funUtil/
toolbox/ (name is definately debatable)
s11n/


toolbox =3D=3D really generic stuff: ConfigFile, etc.

funUtil =3D=3D "fun" stuff: Dice, Fudge, etc.

s11n =3D=3D s11n


Dependencies:

toolbox: none
s11n: toolbox
funUtil: s11n


Building libs becomes a bit different, of course. One way would be to gen=
erate=20
the libs directly under lib/, linking to lib/{funUtil,toolbox,...}/*.o. T=
his=20
may not be a good idea, though, as a) object lists have to be duplicated =
in=20
lib/Makefile or b) lib/Makefile needs to use wildcards, which are potenti=
ally=20
dangerous here.

i haven't made any significant changes to s11n in about 5 days, so it's a=
lmost=20
like i have a 1.0 release ready ;). Let me know what you think of the abo=
ve=20
org proposal and i'll base my commits on that. (i've done a lot of renami=
ng,=20
and need to move a lot of stuff around, anyway).


--=20
----- st...@wa...
http://qub.sourceforge.net  http://libfunutil.sourceforge.net        =20
http://toc.sourceforge.net  http://countermoves.sourceforge.net
http://stephan.rootonfire.org  et al.