[fU] tree structure opinion questions...

[stephan b. <st...@ei...>]

i'd like to go ahead and get s11n into the libfun tree, but i've got a 
couple questions:

it currently uses two namespaces (i.e., two main directories), because 
it relies on my home-rolled toolbox for some operations (well, and the 
ClassLoader is in that toolbox).

Should this be structured as:

lib/s11n/{core,toolbox}
or
lib/{s11n,toolbox}
or C) none of the above

The main consideration, i think, is where the libs will end up being 
built. In my current tree i have:

lib/{s11n,toolbox}, and the lib goes to lib/libs11n.so, but i'll agree 
that's mainly for convenience in terms of:
a) LD_LIBRARY_PATH
b) getting at all the required .o files without using ../../*.o (and the 
like).

What's the preference? (i have no strong one.)

-- 
----- st...@ei... - http://www.einsurance.de
"... NOT because we are America's poodle ..." Tony Blair, 30.9.2003