[fU] Re: extern "C" ... new_XXX() ... finally found a way around it!

[stephan b. <st...@ei...>]

On Wednesday 08 October 2003 11:39, stephan beal wrote:
> In theory (untested) the "bogus variables" created by the macro can
> even have the same name and not worry about multiple definitions,
> because of the properties of anonymous namespaces.

i was wrong about that point, which invalidates:

> - it is free of the conflict which comes up with like-named classes
> in different namespaces: new_Bar() for classes foo::Bar and and
> new_Bar() for bar::Bar.

at the moment i'm experimenting with:

namespace x ## ClassName { ... }

but that has potentially the same collision problems as new_XXX().

-- 
----- st...@ei... - http://www.einsurance.de
"... NOT because we are America's poodle ..." Tony Blair, 30.9.2003