[fU] a different way of handing serializableClass()

[stephan b. <st...@ei...>]

Observation:

Serializable classes are responsible for calling 
node.setSerializableClass() in their serialize().

How about the following change:

add to Serializer interface:

   get/setSerializableClass()

Set this once in the Serializable subclass' ctors and then add the 
following to the SerialTree's serialization code:

  setSerializableClass( sernode.getSerializableClass() )

That is, let the SerialTree ask the serializable for it's class.

With libgcom i've been cheating and using QObject::className() in a base 
class, but that won't work for non-qt code.

-- 
----- stephan
st...@ei... - http://www.einsurance.de
"...control is a degree of inhibition, and a system which is perfectly
inhibited is completely frozen." -- Alan W. Watts