Registrar question... bug?

[stephan b. <st...@s1...>]

=46rom Registrar:

    private:

      static bool&
      _S_reg()
      {
        static bool __reg =3D false;
        return __reg;
      }

      static Registrar _S_instance;

      _Builder const _M_builder;


can't _M_builder be static?

After all, "es kann nuer einen Geben" for each BaseType/SubType/KeyType=20
combination.

Using the current code, calling the following 2 funcs would, i *think*=20
end up with the same effect as a static _M_builder:

Registrar<int,Foo,Bar>( 42 );
Registrar<int,Foo,Bar>( 75 );

am i correct in thinking that the key 75 would never be registered,=20
because of this check in the ctor:

        _S_reg() =3D _S_reg() || _Factory::register_builder(__KEY,=20
_M_builder);




=2D-=20
=2D---- st...@s1...   http://s11n.net
"...pleasure is a grace and is not obedient to the commands
of the will." -- Alan W. Watts