[Libexif-devel] Re: [libexif-cvs] libexif/libexif exif-data.c,1.70,1.71

[Hans U. N. <gp...@n-...>]

Jan Patera <pa...@us...> writes:

> Update of /cvsroot/libexif/libexif/libexif
> In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv19628
>
> Modified Files:
> 	exif-data.c 
> Log Message:
> Corrected byte ordering when sorting tags.
>
>
> Index: exif-data.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/libexif/libexif/libexif/exif-data.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.70
> retrieving revision 1.71
> diff -u -d -r1.70 -r1.71
> --- exif-data.c	16 Mar 2005 07:33:05 -0000	1.70
> +++ exif-data.c	17 Mar 2005 07:43:39 -0000	1.71
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@
>  	/* Sort the directory according to TIFF specification */
>  	qsort (*d + 6 + offset - (ifd->count + n_ptr + n_thumb) * 12,
>  			(ifd->count + n_ptr + n_thumb), 12,
> -			data->priv->order == EXIF_BYTE_ORDER_INTEL ? cmp_le_func : cmp_be_func);
> +			data->priv->order == EXIF_BYTE_ORDER_INTEL ? cmp_be_func : cmp_le_func);
>  
>  	/* Correctly terminate the directory */
>  	if (i == EXIF_IFD_0 && (data->ifd[EXIF_IFD_1]->count ||

I thought Intel byte order was little endian?

Uli