Re: [Libexif-devel] Missing Initialization

[Lutz <lu...@us...>]

On Fri, 2003-12-26 at 23:12, Antonio Scuri wrote:
>    The following tags were missing in exif_entry_initialize at exif-ent=
ry.c:
>=20
> 	EXIF_TAG_FLASH
>            EXIF_TAG_MAKER_NOTE:
>            EXIF_TAG_COMPONENTS_CONFIGURATION
>            EXIF_TAG_COLOR_SPACE
> 	EXIF_TAG_ISO_SPEED_RATINGS
> 	EXIF_TAG_PIXEL_X_DIMENSION
> 	EXIF_TAG_PIXEL_Y_DIMENSION
> 	EXIF_TAG_SPECTRAL_SENSITIVITY
> 	EXIF_TAG_SUBSEC_TIME		=09
> 	EXIF_TAG_SUB_SEC_TIME_ORIGINAL	=09
> 	EXIF_TAG_SUB_SEC_TIME_DIGITIZED	=09
> 	EXIF_TAG_OECF			=09
> 	EXIF_TAG_SPATIAL_FREQUENCY_RESPONSE
> 	EXIF_TAG_NEW_CFA_PATTERN	=09
> 	EXIF_TAG_DEVICE_SETTING_DESCRIPTION=09
> 	EXIF_TAG_SUBJECT_AREA		=09
> 	EXIF_TAG_RELATED_SOUND_FILE	=09
> 	EXIF_TAG_IMAGE_UNIQUE_ID	=09
>=20
>    Some strings are initialized with "[None]", but this is not in the=20
> specs, are they? I guess a better initialization is simply to put 0 and=
 let=20
> the user test for "entry->components =3D=3D 0" to initialize the missin=
g values.

Hello Antonio!

Thanks for spending time on libexif. Could you convert your suggestions
into patches and send them to us? If possible, please use 'cvs diff -u3
-p'.=20

Regards
--=20
Lutz M=FCller <lu...@us...>