Hello! Has anyone time to package current cvs ('make dist' or better 'make distcheck')? --=20 Lutz M=FCller <lu...@us...>
Lutz M=FCller <lu...@us...> writes: > Has anyone time to package current cvs ('make dist' or better 'make > distcheck')? Good idea. Then we can migrate the gphoto2 stuff to the new libexif as well and do gphoto2 release... I'm off compiling... Uli --=20 Some gphoto2 links: http://www.teaser.fr/~hfiguiere/linux/digicam.html http://gphoto.sf.net/ http://n-dimensional.de/projects/digicam/ #gphoto on irc.freenode.net http://sf.net/projects/gphoto http://sf.net/projects/libusb http://sf.net/projects/libexif
Lutz M=FCller <lu...@us...> writes: > Has anyone time to package current cvs ('make dist' or better 'make > distcheck')? OK, while I was trying that, I've found that in HEAD, configure.in says that libexif is 0.5.12 exif is 0.6 and depends on libexif >=3D 0.5.13 There are no CVS tags which reflect the last few release tarballs. :-( So I cannot quite figure out the rationale behind those version numbers. So should we just release libexif 0.7.0 exif 0.7.0 depending on libexif >=3D 0.7.0 ? Gru=DF, Uli --=20 Some gphoto2 links: http://www.teaser.fr/~hfiguiere/linux/digicam.html http://gphoto.sf.net/ http://n-dimensional.de/projects/digicam/ #gphoto on irc.freenode.net http://sf.net/projects/gphoto http://sf.net/projects/libusb http://sf.net/projects/libexif
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 20:52, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote: > So should we just release > > libexif 0.7.0 > exif 0.7.0 depending on libexif >= 0.7.0 Sounds good for me. Lutz
You seem to have CSS turned off. Please don't fill out this field.
Click URL instructions: Right-click on the ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here → (This may not be possible with some types of ads)
Ad destination/click URL:
