|
From: Brent C. <bca...@sg...> - 2006-03-07 20:28:58
|
The reorder_block() zigzag behaves incorrectly in the !ARCH_X86 &&
!ARCH_X86_64 case. The current code fails to take into account the
effects of _dv_prepare_reorder_tables(), which changes the indexes
contained in the reorder_88[] and reorder_248[] arrays.
---
Restore older, known good, reorder_block() inner loop.
encode.c | 7 +++----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -ru libdv-0.104-orig/libdv/encode.c libdv-0.104-fixed/libdv/encode.c
--- libdv-0.104-orig/libdv/encode.c 2004-11-16 21:36:30.000000000 -0600
+++ libdv-0.104-fixed/libdv/encode.c 2006-03-07 14:07:22.000000000 -0600
@@ -512,10 +512,9 @@
_dv_reorder_block_mmx_x86_64(bl->coeffs, reorder);
emms();
#else
- for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
- // *(unsigned short*) ((char*) zigzag + reorder[i])=bl->coeffs[i];
- zigzag[reorder[i] - 1] = bl->coeffs[i];
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
+ *(unsigned short*) ((char*) zigzag + reorder[i])=bl->coeffs[i];
+
memcpy(bl->coeffs, zigzag, 64 * sizeof(dv_coeff_t));
#endif
}
|