Re: [Libdkim-discuss] DKIM problem

[Peter C. <co...@qu...>]

Hi again,

Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 schrieb Peter Conrad:
> 
> IMO RFC-4871 is not clear on which behaviour is correct. Section 3.4
> mandates that for "simple" canonicalization all whitespace is to be
> preserved, while section 3.7 requires the value of the "b=" tag to be
> removed for verifying. It is unclear if the FWS between tag and value is
> to be removed or not.

apparently this is a known problem:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4871&eid=1596

If I understand this correctly, Mail::DKIM is right and libdkim is wrong.

Bye,
	Peter