Thread: [libdc1394-devel] Reply-To-List?
Capture and control API for IIDC compliant cameras
Brought to you by:
ddouxchamps,
gordp
From: Damien D. <ddo...@is...> - 2006-03-31 05:40:24
|
Hi all, List member Cadgas proposed to set a default reply-to-list field instead of the current reply-to-original-poster. This would avoid receiving emails twice when someone replies to you as well as avoid unintentional out-of-list discussions. Although I would also favour this option, it may lead to some tricky situations that are not too difficult to imagine as the reply will be broadcast to everyone by default. Let's hear your comments about this change, if you have any. If there is no strong opposition I will switch to a default "reply-to-list" behaviour within a week or so. Damien -- _ Damien 'Takahara' Douxchamps, PhD ('- Post-doctoral investigator //\ Image Processing Group, NAIST V_/_ http://chihara.aist-nara.ac.jp/ |
From: J. A. H. <al...@av...> - 2006-03-31 06:02:05
|
On 31/03/06 06:38:55, Damien Douxchamps wrote: > Let's hear your comments about this change, if you have any. If there > is no strong opposition I will switch to a default "reply-to-list" > behaviour within a week or so. Personally, I almost always use this, despite mailman's rather strong =20 warning to the contrary. It's much easier to be able to just hit reply. Cheers, --=20 Ali Harlow Email: al...@av... Senior Research Officer Tel: (020) 7040 4348 Applied Vision Research Centre Intl: +44 20 7040 4348 City University Fax: (020) 7040 5515 London Intl: +44 20 7040 5515 |
From: Markus M. <me...@me...> - 2006-03-31 08:09:39
|
Hi Damien, IIRC a general rule of thumb is that if the list is subscribers-only and relatively low-volume, it can be "reply-to-list", because the subscriber will get the list emails anyway and can quickly look over it. Markus Damien Douxchamps schrieb: >Hi all, > >List member Cadgas proposed to set a default reply-to-list field instead >of the current reply-to-original-poster. This would avoid receiving >emails twice when someone replies to you as well as avoid unintentional >out-of-list discussions. > >Although I would also favour this option, it may lead to some tricky >situations that are not too difficult to imagine as the reply will be >broadcast to everyone by default. > >Let's hear your comments about this change, if you have any. If there is >no strong opposition I will switch to a default "reply-to-list" >behaviour within a week or so. > >Damien > > > |