Re: [libdbi-devel] [Libdbi-drivers-devel] licensing inconsistency

[Christian M. S. <chr...@st...>]

Hi,

Atleast for the drivers that I have created (mSQL, Oracle, Firebird/ 
Interbase), the intended license is LGPL as that is
what I need myself in the commercial products I use them for ;)

If they are not LGPL today, they will be changes to LGPL ASAP.


regards,


//Christian







On 8 Mar 2007, at 11:18, Balazs Scheidler wrote:

> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 11:13 +0100, Kjell Irgens wrote:
>> Markus Hoenicka wrote:
>>> Hi Balasz,
>>>
>>> I'm actually surprised to learn that all drivers except sqlite/ 
>>> sqlite3
>>> are LGPL'ed. I wasn't aware that we distribute software with
>>> inconsistent licensing. I'd like to hear what the other developers
>>> think about this problem. Can we simply change the license of the
>>> sqlite/sqlite3 drivers to LGPL to make the whole thing consistent?
>>>
>> That would be good, I have assumed LGPL as long as I use the  
>> PostgreSQL
>> driver only.  I had not noticed that libdb-drivers was not  
>> documented as
>> LPGL in all files.
>>
>> By the way, thanks for the new release!
>
> Does this mean that the intention is LGPL? That'd clear up things for
> me, of course a release with consistent license notations would be  
> more
> than appreciated :)
>
> -- 
> Bazsi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to  
> share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php? 
> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Libdbi-drivers-devel mailing list
> Lib...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-drivers-devel