|
From: Markus H. <mar...@mh...> - 2009-11-24 08:25:29
|
Hi João,
please change these values as needed. I just took wild guesses from
looking over the code real quick, so I may have missed some of the
longer strings.
regards,
Markus
Quoting João Henrique Freitas <jo...@gm...>:
> Hi
>
> I am using the accessor funcions to fetch the values. I think two
> member of struct FIELDINFO need to be more big.
>
> struct FIELDINFO {
> char name[32];
> unsigned short type;
> unsigned int attrib;
> union {
> long long int int_val;
> unsigned long long int uint_val;
> double double_val;
> char string_val[48];
> } expect_val;
> long long expect_as_longlong;
> char expect_as_string[48];
> };
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>>
>> 2009/11/12 Markus Hoenicka <mar...@mh...>:
>>> Markus Hoenicka writes:
>>> > I'll have to rewrite the accessor functions, and add new ones to make
>>> > the expected values available to calling functions. Then we'd have to
>>>
>>> I've finished adding the accessor functions. Now we should have all
>>> the infrastructure available to rewrite the tests. These should use
>>> values taken from the structures via the accessor functions instead of
>>> hardcoded values.
>>>
>>> Once that is done, I'd like to rearrange the code in test_dbi.c to
>>> separate driver-specific code from non-specific code. This way we
>>> could draw a line claiming "no driver-specific changes required below
>>> this line" to make adding new drivers more pleasant.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Markus
>>>
>>> --
>>> Markus Hoenicka
>>> http://www.mhoenicka.de
>>> AQ score 38
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> João Henrique Freitas - joaohf_at_gmail.com
>> Campinas-SP-Brasil
>> BSD051283
>> LPI 1
>> http://www.joaohfreitas.eti.br
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> João Henrique Freitas - joaohf_at_gmail.com
> Campinas-SP-Brasil
> BSD051283
> LPI 1
> http://www.joaohfreitas.eti.br
>
--
Markus Hoenicka
http://www.mhoenicka.de
AQ score 38
|