Re: [libdbi-devel] Branch-2009-10-12 test status

[João H. F. <jo...@gm...>]

Hi

I am using the accessor funcions to fetch the values. I think two
member of struct FIELDINFO need to be more big.

struct FIELDINFO {
  char name[32];
  unsigned short type;
  unsigned int attrib;
  union {
    long long int int_val;
    unsigned long long int uint_val;
    double double_val;
    char string_val[48];
  } expect_val;
  long long expect_as_longlong;
  char expect_as_string[48];
};



Thanks.

>
>
> 2009/11/12 Markus Hoenicka <mar...@mh...>:
>> Markus Hoenicka writes:
>>  > I'll have to rewrite the accessor functions, and add new ones to make
>>  > the expected values available to calling functions. Then we'd have to
>>
>> I've finished adding the accessor functions. Now we should have all
>> the infrastructure available to rewrite the tests. These should use
>> values taken from the structures via the accessor functions instead of
>> hardcoded values.
>>
>> Once that is done, I'd like to rearrange the code in test_dbi.c to
>> separate driver-specific code from non-specific code. This way we
>> could draw a line claiming "no driver-specific changes required below
>> this line" to make adding new drivers more pleasant.
>>
>> regards,
>> Markus
>>
>> --
>> Markus Hoenicka
>> http://www.mhoenicka.de
>> AQ score 38
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> João Henrique Freitas - joaohf_at_gmail.com
> Campinas-SP-Brasil
> BSD051283
> LPI 1
> http://www.joaohfreitas.eti.br
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
João Henrique Freitas - joaohf_at_gmail.com
Campinas-SP-Brasil
BSD051283
LPI 1
http://www.joaohfreitas.eti.br