|
From: Michael M. <mi...@gn...> - 2009-10-14 00:53:13
|
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 22:56:16 Markus Hoenicka wrote: > > ==4240== LEAK SUMMARY: > ==4240== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==4240== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==4240== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==4240== still reachable: 3,942 bytes in 12 blocks > ==4240== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > > If you have a chance to test the current sources on your platform, > please let me know if your leaks are cured as well. > Thanks for looking into this so quickly. I realised it was a "one-off" leak and not the source of my growing leak problem. But I guess it's good it's totally leak-free now. Also apologies I posted C++ code where it wasn't really necessary. All the best mimo |