Re: [libdbi-devel] Library version macro

[Florian F. <sou...@no...>]

Good morning,

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 01:06:48AM +0100, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> major = current - age
> minor = age
> patch = revision
> 
> If that serves everyone's needs, I'll be happy to use this.

it got my vote :)

> However, 0.1.0 is not an obvious successor for 0.8.3. So, should we
> use:
> 
> major = current - age
> minor = age + 8
> patch = revision
> 
> until major is actually increased?

Sounds reasonable, too. I think we've reached a good consensus all
around :)

Regards,
-octo
-- 
Florian octo Forster
Hacker in training
GnuPG: 0x91523C3D
http://verplant.org/