Re: [libdb-develop] modularizing schema?
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
morbus
From: Morbus I. <mo...@di...> - 2005-02-19 17:59:30
|
> Things are quiet here. Looking at the SQL schema again, is it possible > to break out the genre/media-specific content into separate files? A > lot of the bulk of the schema is just stuff specific to people > cataloguing movies, and I don't want most of that stuff in my db if I'm The FRBR spec contains numerous suggested fields for books, serials, and audio materials, but I've not included those in the actual tables, as you know, because they wouldn't have actually been used (for my initial purposes, etc.). But, "genre" in LibDB is being handled with the "concept" table, which is a Group 3 entity in FRBR. The plan, once movies were "done", was to simply add the media-specific fields to the relevant tables (page numbers to manifestations, etc.). Unfortunatley, I'm not sure what is going on with LibDB anymore. I've had no time to work on it, and the company that I /was/ working on this for has gone with a "quick" alternative that I set up in a few hours (for the probably-live-next-week demo, see http://cinema93.com/movies). Unfortunately, this "quick" alternative was a "just get it done for the mundanes and the non-libtechs", so it has very little merit for those interested in the original goal of LibDB. With that said, and with that company no longer "bugging" me to get something done, I'm not sure I'll have "time" to work on LibDB for a very long time, if at all. The original impetus is gone, there are other projects that are taking up a lot of my effort and, though there was a lot of interest in the Drupal world for it, there were no additional developers who had the libtech knowledge to do it "right". -- Morbus Iff ( anything else in the box, pandora? ) Technical: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779 Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/ icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org: morbus |